CIRCUMCISIONS OF LAW AND OF SPIRIT.
As we have flesh and spirit and so are there two gods; one of
flesh or the creation that you can “see” with the two natural eyes of Yahweh,
Brahma, Khuda, etc., the demiurge gods of Nature at
large or heaven and earth and he lives isolated in “Heaven” as he is the Lord
of creation, flesh called Potter and the other is of spirit, our Supernatural
Father of our “Souls” that you cannot see but Perceive. He is not alienated
like the demiurge Yahweh but He lives in His Temple, our physical body created
by the greatest artist Yahweh, Brahma, Khuda, etc.,
leaving no imperfection. Thus, the physical body Jesus called Yashua in Hebrew stands for Ya = Yahweh and Shua =
Shiva = Second Adam or Jesus’s heavenly father is “Tahweh”
and Mary was Surrogate Mother and Joseph of the Judah tribe in the line of King
David, the Foster father. The “Soul” inside Jesus is of our ever living eternal
Supernatural Father Elohim, Allah, Parbrahm, etc.,
and He being the anointed Son of Elohim, He was the “Christ” with the Holy
Spirit, the Very Spirit of God making Him the Omniscient and Omnipotent
Ambassador of our Supernatural Father Elohim, Allah, Parbrahm,
etc. In short, his physical body “Jesus” was born and Jesus died on the Cross
and not the Eternal Spirit Christ. This Jesus demonstrated in His poor Friend
Lazarus, a true example of Resurrection. In the dead Book knowledge of the
letters, people were born and die but not in the very Spirit of Mammon-Free
God, the poor Lazarus.
Here are the two Covenants marked by the visible circumcision
of the flesh – Hajj of Shariyatt (7 in the name of
Yahweh) and the invisible Circumcision of Heart (5 in the name of Elohim) –
Al-Hajj of Tarikatt of the Five Spiritual ailments; Kaam, immorality, Karodhh –
anger, Lobh – Greed, Moh –
worldly attractions – secular rule and finally the Haughtiness of the spiritual
knowledge by the dead letters as was displayed by the Jerusalem Professors of
Theology that made them arrogant super donkeys carrying the Holy Books . These are also the 5 Husbands of the
Samaritan Woman at well Saint Photina that the men of
dead letters, University Theologians call a prostitute marrying one husband
after the other. Such men of the dead letters are “Super Donkeys carrying the
Holy Books” and they hate men of the holy spirit, which is “common sense = Surtti”.
Now, you will understand the Two Circumcisions; one of flesh
in Yahweh, Brahma, Khuda, etc. and the other
Al-Circumcision of your spirit in Elohim, Allah, Parbrahm,
etc. And unless you are circumcised in flesh, Baptism of John, the Baptist in
the name of Abraham, you cannot be Al-Baptised in the Holy Spirit, the “Eucharist”
called entering the “Bridal Chamber” for the Al-Circumcision of the Heart.
Mere circumcision of the flesh but breaking your covenant with Abraham makes you super bastards against a natural bastard born of the prostitutes, the mustard seeds, who could be Saint and people visit Him to listen to his discourses. John 8v44 stressed this point and they, the super bastard Jews outwardly took stones to kill Jesus.
The idea of “circumcision of the heart” is found in Romans 2:29. It refers to having a pure heart, separated unto God. Paul
writes, “A Jew is one inwardly, and circumcision is a matter of the heart, by
the Spirit, not by the letter.” These words conclude a sometimes confusing
passage of Scripture regarding circumcision and the Christian. Verses 25-29
provide context:
“For circumcision indeed is of value if you obey
the law, but if you break the law, your circumcision becomes uncircumcision.
So, if a man who is uncircumcised keeps the precepts of the law, will not his
uncircumcision be regarded as circumcision? Then he who is physically
uncircumcised but keeps the law will condemn you who have the written code and
circumcision but break the law. For no one is a Jew who is merely one
outwardly, nor is circumcision outward and physical. But a Jew is one inwardly,
and circumcision is a matter of the heart, by the Spirit, not by the letter.
His praise is not from man but from God.”
Paul is discussing the role of the Old Testament
Law as it relates to Christianity. He argues that Jewish circumcision is only
an outward sign of being set apart to demiurge god Yahweh. However, if the
heart is sinful, then physical circumcision is of no avail. A circumcised body
and a sinful heart are at odds with each other. Rather than focus on external
rites, Paul focuses on the condition of the heart. Using circumcision as a
metaphor, he says that only the Holy Spirit can purify a heart and set us apart
to God. Ultimately, circumcision cannot make a person right with God; the Law
is not enough. A person’s heart must change. Paul calls this change
“circumcision of the heart.”
This concept was not original with the apostle
Paul. As a Jew trained in the Law of Moses, he was certainly aware of this
discussion from Deuteronomy 30. There, the Lord used the same metaphor
to communicate His desire for a holy people: “And the LORD your God will
circumcise your heart and the heart of your offspring, so that you will love
the LORD your God with all your heart and with all your soul,
that you may live” (Deuteronomy 30:6). Physical circumcision was a sign of
Israel’s covenant with God; circumcision of the heart, therefore, would
indicate Israel’s being set apart to love God fully,
inside and out.
John the Baptist warned the Pharisees against
taking pride in their physical heritage and boasting in their circumcision: “Do
not think you can say to yourselves, 'We have Abraham as our father.' I tell
you that out of these stones God can raise up children for Abraham” (Matthew 3:9).
True “children of Abraham” are those who follow
Abraham’s example of believing God (Genesis 15:6) and demonstrated by the Samaritans, a Nation of Prophets.
Physical circumcision does not make one a child of God Elohim; faith does.
Believers in Jesus Christ can truly say they are children of “Father Abraham”,
born of water. “If you belong to Christ, then you are Abraham’s seed, and heirs
according to the promise” (Galatians 3:29).
God has always wanted more from His people than
just external conformity to a set of rules. He has always wanted them to
possess a heart to love, know, and follow Him. That’s why God is not concerned
with a circumcision of the flesh. Even in the Old Testament, God’s priority was
a spiritual circumcision of the heart: “Circumcise yourselves to the LORD,
circumcise your hearts, you men of Judah and people of Jerusalem, or my wrath
will break out and burn like fire because of the evil you have done” (Jeremiah 4:4).
Both Testaments focus on the need for repentance
and inward change in order to be right with God. In Jesus, the Law has been
fulfilled (Matthew 5:17). Through Him, a person can be made
right with God and receive eternal life (John 3:16; Ephesians 2:8-9). As Paul said, true Al-circumcision is
a matter of the heart, performed by the Spirit of God.
Here is a reply from a
Messianic Jew full of corruptions. Circumcision is the Tribal Mark of Abraham
to his real son born of Sarah and nobody else can have it except the sons of
Isaac. I lived in Ghana and over there, they have the tribal marks which no one
else can have it otherwise he will die. The creator of male and female is “Yahweh,
Brahma, Khuda, etc.”, the
greatest artists who left no defects that men need to change. Full of
corruptions c reated by the Messianic Jews and when
Angel Stephen told them not to circumcise male children other than of the
Isaac, then the Temple Priests started to grind their teeth to kill him as he
was stifling their business. How could you buy a physical body into your tribal
fold through money? Only FOOLS would believe these Jews.
Your questions on
circumcision
Inbox
Richard Harvey
19:46 (3 hours ago)
to
me, Jennifer
Dear Rajinder Nijjhar
Thanks for your great
questions - here are a few quick responses and some further studies for you if
you wish to research this further.
Here are his plentiful
questions: I Preach Christianity and I am curious about circumcision. Would you
tell me what is the purpose of circumcision
It is the sign of the
covenant with Abraham - see Genesis 15 and Genesis 17 where it is a sign and
guarantee of the commitment God makes to Abraham in Genesis 12:1-3 to give him
descendants, a nation, a name, and to be a blessing.
and
why Ishmael was not circumcised but Isaac only?
Ishmael was also
circumcised -
23 Then Abraham took
Ishmael his son and all those born in his house or bought with his money, every
male among the men of Abraham’s house, and he circumcised the flesh of their
foreskins that very day, as God had said to him. 24 Abraham was ninety-nine
years old when he was circumcised in the flesh of his foreskin. 25 And Ishmael
his son was thirteen years old when he was circumcised in the flesh of his
foreskin. 26 That very day Abraham and his son Ishmael were circumcised. 27 And
all the men of his house, those born in the house and those bought with money
from a foreigner, were circumcised with him.
The Holy Bible: English Standard Version
(Wheaton, IL: Crossway Bibles, 2016), Ge 17:23–27.
Also, ask them whether it was lawful to
circumcise the Gentiles and Slaves as the Temple Priests were doing?
Before the coming of
Jesus, if a non-Jew wanted to become part of the Jewish people, the males would
be circumcised - see
Institution of the
Passover
43 And the Lord said to
Moses and Aaron, “This is the statute of the Passover: no foreigner shall eat
of it, 44 but every slave that is bought for money may eat of it after you have
circumcised him. 45 No foreigner or hired worker may eat of it. 46 It shall be
eaten in one house; you shall not take any of the flesh outside the house, and
you shall not break any of its bones. 47 All the congregation of Israel shall
keep it. 48 If a stranger shall sojourn with you and would keep the Passover to
the Lord, let all his males be circumcised. Then he may come near and keep it;
he shall be as a native of the land. But no uncircumcised person shall eat of
it. 49 There shall be one law for the native and for the stranger who sojourns
among you.
The Holy Bible: English Standard Version
(Wheaton, IL: Crossway Bibles, 2016), Ex 12:43–49.
Ask them why Angel
Stephen was killed by the Temple Jews when he stressed that our forefather
Abraham was a Nobel man?”
This was because of his
challenge to them to repent of the crucifixion of Jesus - they were circumcised
physically but not in their hearts -
51
“You stiff-necked people, uncircumcised in heart and ears, you always resist
the Holy Spirit. As your fathers did, so do you. 52
Which of the prophets did your fathers not persecute? And they killed those who
announced beforehand the coming of the Righteous One, whom you have now
betrayed and murdered, 53 you who received the law as delivered by angels and
did not keep it.”
The Stoning of Stephen
54 Now when they heard
these things they were enraged, and they ground their teeth at him. 55 But he,
full of the Holy Spirit, gazed into heaven and saw the glory of God, and Jesus
standing at the right hand of God. 56 And he said, “Behold, I see the heavens
opened, and the Son of Man standing at the right hand of God.” 57 But they
cried out with a loud voice and stopped their ears and rushed together at him.
58 Then they cast him out of the city and stoned him. And the witnesses laid
down their garments at the feet of a young man named Saul. 59 And as they were
stoning Stephen, he called out, “Lord Jesus, receive my spirit.” 60 And falling
to his knees he cried out with a loud voice, “Lord, do not hold this sin against
them.” And when he had said this, he fell asleep.
The Holy Bible: English Standard Version
(Wheaton, IL: Crossway Bibles, 2016), Ac 7:51–60.
Here is an article on
circumcision in scripture - do get back to me if you have further questions -
best regards - Richard Harvey
Circumcision
(מוּלָה, mulah;
περιτομή, peritomē). The ritual act
of incising or removing a male child’s foreskin eight days after birth (Gen
17:12; Lev 12:3; Luke 2:21). A sign of Abraham’s covenant
with God (Gen 17:9–14).
Circumcision in the Old
Testament
Covenant
As part of the covenant
that God established with Abraham in Gen 17:10–14, every male living with
Abraham, “both he who is born in your house and he who is bought with your
money” (Gen 17:13 ESV), was to be circumcised. In this way, the covenant was
“in [their] flesh” (Gen 17:13 ESV). In addition, every newborn
male was to be circumcised on the eighth day (Gen 17:12; see also Lev 12:3).
Circumcision was ultimately a sign of God’s covenant and the blessing it
brings.
The remainder of the
narratives and laws of the Pentateuch reinforce the command that all Israelite
males as well as male slaves and resident aliens living among them were to be
circumcised (e.g., Exod 4:24–26). The Mosaic law
further specifies that males must be circumcised in order to participate in the
Passover, and male slaves and resident aliens could participate in the Passover
only after they had been circumcised (Exod 12:43–49).
This statute is reinforced in Josh 5, when Joshua circumcises all the
uncircumcised Israelite males prior to observing Passover in the wilderness
(Josh 5:2–12).
Any Israelite male who
was not circumcised was to be “cut off” from the “kin of his father” for
breaking the covenant of God (Gen 17:14). Those outside the covenant were
described as “the uncircumcised”—the godless, wicked enemies of God (Judg 15:18; 1 Sam 17:26; 2 Sam 1:20; Ezek
32:17–32). Goliath and all of the Philistines are described as uncircumcised (1
Sam 17:36; 18:25)
Protection
As a covenant symbol,
the act of circumcision occasionally empowered or protected the Israelites. For
example, in Gen 34, when Shechem rapes Dinah and then
asks for her hand in marriage, Jacob’s sons agree to the marriage under the
condition that all Shechemite males be circumcised.
While the Shechemites are in a weakened state after
the circumcision, Jacob’s sons kill them and plunder the city. Shechem’s act of violence was thus countered with another
act of violence; in this case, that violence included a ritual that was part of
God’s covenant with Abraham. The Shechemite circumcision
and other circumcisions in the Old Testament are similar in that the Israelites
were empowered through the act. In Joshua 5, the Israelites were circumcised
just before their battle with Jericho, which they won; in Gen 34, they were
victorious by circumcising the Shechemites.
Exodus 4 records that
when God “sought to put [Moses] to death” (Exod 4:24
ESV), Moses’ wife, Zipporah, circumcised her son and touched Moses’ feet with
the foreskin (Exod 4:25). God subsequently “let
[Moses] alone” (Exod 4:26 ESV). The text does not
specify why God sought to kill Moses, but it makes it clear that circumcision
protected Moses.
Faith
Circumcision also has a
metaphorical application in the Old Testament. For example, Deuteronomy 10:16
instructs the Israelites to circumcise the foreskins of their hearts and cease
being stubborn. Later in Deuteronomy, the Lord promises to circumcise the
Israelites’ hearts so that they will love Him (Deut
30:6). In both cases, circumcision of the heart brings about a proper attitude
toward God. The Septuagint translations of these verses use a verb associated
with purity (περιτέμνω,
peritemnō; and περικαθαρίζω,
perikatharizō) rather than the common Greek word
for circumcision. This connects circumcision with purification—a Jewish
practice that also helped people be in proper
relationship with God.
In the prophecies of
Jeremiah, the Lord warns the people of Judah and Jerusalem to circumcise the
foreskins of their hearts in order to avoid His wrath (Jer
4:4). He further warns that He will “punish all those who are circumcised
merely in the flesh” (Jer 9:25 ESV), and He accuses
the Israelites of being “uncircumcised in heart” (Jer
9:26 ESV). This suggests that a circumcised heart, not just a physical
circumcision, is necessary to avoid God’s wrath. Even the circumcised
Israelites were considered uncircumcised if they did not have knowledge of
Yahweh and practice kindness and righteousness.
Circumcision in the New
Testament
Practice
The practice of
circumcising males continued into the New Testament period. The Gospels record
that both John the Baptist and Jesus were circumcised when they were eight days
old (Luke 1:59; 2:21), as Abraham’s son Isaac had been (Acts 7:8). The Apostle
Paul also records that he was circumcised on the eighth day (Phil 3:5). These
references to circumcision demonstrate that circumcision remained an important
part of Jewish identity in the New Testament period.
Development
The question of whether
Gentile converts to Christianity needed to first undergo circumcision was a
divisive issue in the early church (Acts 11:3). Acts 15 records that people
from Judaea were teaching that circumcision was necessary for salvation. Some
Jewish followers of Jesus thought that Gentiles should follow the precepts of
the Mosaic law, while others, such as Paul, thought
this was unnecessary for Gentiles.
Paul further elaborates
on the matter of circumcision in his letters. In Galatians in particular, Paul
takes a strong stance against imposing circumcision on Gentile believers,
arguing that circumcision demands that someone obey the whole law (e.g., Gal 5;
6:15). Paul makes a similar argument in Romans, where he speaks of circumcision
of the heart as being true circumcision (Rom 2:29).
The phrase “putting off
the body of flesh” in Colossians can be understood as a reference to Christ’s
death (Moule, Colossians, 94–96) or as a new kind of
spiritual circumcision, in which we “put off the old person” (Col 3:9; see also
Rom 2:29; Ladd, A Theology, 529). The metaphors of circumcision, putting off
the flesh, burial in baptism, and resurrection with Christ all point toward the
people of God being restored to the covenant blessings of Israel (Ladd, A
Theology, 529). As a result of this spiritual circumcision, believers receive
the forgiveness of sins (Col 2:13; Eph 2:11–13) and
experience the removal of “the barrier, the dividing wall of hostility” (Eph 2:14). Like physical circumcision, spiritual
circumcision is an event, a result of the death and resurrection of Christ, not
a subjective experience or objective performance (Ladd, A Theology, 529).
Origins of the Practice
Many early Greek
writers identified circumcision as an old custom with origins that could be
traced to the Egyptians, not the Jews (Schäfer, Judeophobia, 93). For example, the Greek historian
Herodotus (484–425 bc) wrote
that “the Colchians and Egyptians and Ethiopians are the only nations that have
from the first practiced circumcision” (Herodotus, Histories, 2.104). However,
the Graeco-Roman historian and orator Timagenes (first century bc) maintained that circumcision was a Jewish
practice (Stern, Greek and Latin Authors, 81).
Historical Background
Although there is no
concrete evidence that circumcision was practiced in Mesopotamia, it is
attested elsewhere in the ancient Near East. The circumcision of male boys was
a common practice among the Ammonites, the Moabites, the Edomites,
and the Egyptians (compare Jer 9:25–26; Josh 5:2–9; Soggin, Israel in the Biblical Period, 72). In cultures
outside Israel, adolescent and adult males primarily were circumcised. For this
reason, the ritual may have been associated with male fertility or practiced in
preparation for marriage. Sometimes the foreskin was simply incised, but at
other times it was removed.
Egypt and
Syria-Palestine
The people of ancient
Egypt and Syria-Palestine are known to have practiced circumcision (compare
Josh 5:2–9, which may imply that Egyptians did not practice it; Soggin, Israel in the Biblical Period, 72). The Egyptians
circumcised males when they were adolescents. In later periods, priests and
those who served in temples were probably required to be circumcised, as
circumcision was associated with purity (Pinch, “Private Life in Ancient
Egypt,” 378; Te Velde,
“Theology, Priests,” 1733). The method of circumcision seems to have involved
an incision of the foreskin rather than complete removal (Sasson,
“Circumcision in the Ancient Near East,” 474).
Evidence of male
circumcision exists in northern Syria as early as the early third millennium bc (Sasson,
“Circumcision in the Ancient Near East,” 476). There may be textual evidence of
the circumcision of bridegrooms in Ugarit in the second millennium bc (Wyatt, “Circumcision and
Circumstance,” 421–22). Circumcision may have been a general practice in this
region, with the exception of the Philistines.
Greece and Rome
Neither the Greeks nor
the Romans circumcised males. Strabo (64 bc–ad 21)
and Tacitus (ad 56–120) deride the custom as superstitious and depraved and
portray it as an attempt to control sexual relations between Jews and Gentiles
(Hoffman, Covenant of Blood, 9). Schäfer notes that
Greek artists, particularly vase painters, seemed “to regard the retraction of
the foreskin and the exposure of the glans as ugly and crude, reserved for
satyrs, ugly old men, barbarians, and comic burlesque” (Schäfer,
Judeophobia, 105). The Roman emperor Hadrian
considered circumcision to be a “barbarous mutilation”—an opinion that may have
been influenced by Greek belief in the beauty and perfection of the body rather
than a “moral objection” to the practice (Schäfer, Judeophobia, 105). Tacitus argued that Jews “adopted
circumcision to distinguish themselves from other peoples” (Tacitus, Historiae, 5.1–13) and used the practice to express their
“hate and enmity” of others (Tacitus, Historiae,
5.1–13).
Jewish writings from
the Hellenistic period display varied viewpoints regarding circumcision. Some
Jews of this period considered circumcision as an obligatory physical mark that
distinguished them from other peoples; others did not consider circumcision to
be obligatory. According to Josephus, Herod the Great and his grandson,
Agrippa, required foreign suitors of their daughters and sisters to be
circumcised before they could marry into the family (Josephus, Antiquities,
16.7, 6, 225; 9, 1–4, 271–299; 10, 8–9, 335–355). Philo argued that circumcision
was necessary both hygienically and morally in order to temper passion and
reduce conceit (Philo, On the Special Laws, 1.8–11).
In the Alexandrian
Empire (ca. 333 bc), male
members of society participated in the gymnasium, where they practiced sports
unclothed. Because the Greeks did not practice circumcision, those who were
circumcised could be shunned socially. Hellenized Jews thus ceased the practice
of circumcision so their sons could participate in the gymnasium without
persecution. Others may have tried to restore the foreskin or to remove only a
symbolic, unnoticeable piece of the foreskin. These attempts to assimilate
caused discord with Jews who viewed circumcision as essential to Jewish
identity, as recorded in 1 and 2 Maccabees. For example, 1 Maccabees 1:15
associates Jews who “made themselves uncircumcised and abandoned the holy
covenant” with evil actions.
The Seleucid ruler
Antiochus IV Epiphanes prohibited circumcision (1 Maccabees 1:48; 2 Maccabees
6:10) and desecrated the Jewish temple in Jerusalem (1 Maccabees 1:54–56) to
demonstrate his rejection of Judaism; 1 and 4 Maccabees record that Greek
officials killed anyone who circumcised their children (1 Maccabees 1:60–61; 4
Maccabees 4:25). A similar ban against circumcision was a major factor in the
Bar Kokhba Revolt of the second century ad (Hoffman,
Covenant of Blood, 9).
Selected Resources for
Further Study
Bergsma, John S. The
Jubilee from Leviticus to Qumran: A History of Interpretation. Supplements to Vetus Testamentum
115. Leiden: Brill, 2007.
Brueggemann,
Walter. Worship in Ancient Israel: An Essential Guide. Nashville: Abingdon,
2005.
Dunn, James D. G.
Romans 1–8. Word Biblical Commentary 38A. Dallas: Word, 1998.
Frey,
Jörg, Daniel R. Schwarz, and Stephanie Gripentorg, eds. Jewish Identity in the Greco-Roman World.
Ancient Judaism and Early Christianity 71. Leiden:
Brill, 2007.
Hoffman, A. Lawrence. The
Covenant of Blood: Circumcision and Gender in Rabbinic Judaism. Chicago Studies in the History of Judaism. Chicago:
University of Chicago Press, 1996.
Ladd, George Eldon. A Theology of the New Testament. Grand Rapids: Eerdmans,
1993.
Moule,
Handley Carr Glyn. The Epistles to
the Colossians and to Philemon. The Cambridge Bible
for Schools and Colleges 55. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press,
1893.
Pinch, Geraldine. “Private Life in Ancient Egypt.” Pages 363–81 in
Civilizations of the Ancient Near East. Edited by Jack M. Sasson. Peabody,
Mass.: Hendrickson Publishers, 1995.
Sasson,
Jack M. “Circumcision in the Ancient Near East.”
Journal of Biblical Literature 85, no. 4 (1966): 473–76.
Schäfer,
Peter. Judeophobia: Attitudes toward the Jews in the
Ancient World. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press, 1997.
———. The History of
Jews in Antiquity: The Jews of Palestine from Alexander the Great to Arab
Conquest. Luxembourg: Harwood Academic, 1995.
Soggin,
J. Alberto. Israel in the Biblical Period: Institutions, Festivals, Ceremonies,
Rituals. Translated by John Bowden. New York: T&T
Clark, 2000.
Stern, Menahem. Greek and Latin Authors on Jews
and Judaism. 3 vols. Jerusalem: Israel Academy of Sciences and
Humanities, 1976, 1980, 1984.
Te
Velde, Herman. “Theology, Priests, and Worship in
Ancient Egypt.” Pages 1731–49 in Civilizations of the Ancient Near East. Edited by Jack M. Sasson. Peabody, Mass.: Hendrickson Publishers,
1995.
Kelly A. Whitcomb and Getachew
Kiros, “Circumcision,” ed. John D. Barry et al., The Lexham Bible Dictionary
(Bellingham, WA: Lexham Press, 2016).
Proofs of the Virgin Birth of Jesus: - www.gnosticgospel.co.uk/bojes.htm
Here is a related Youtube Video on the Family
of God:-
For further information, please
visit my website and watch my Youtube Videos; channel nijjhar1.
Ch. Rajinder Nijjhar, M.Sc.
Retired Senior Lecturer in Metallurgy
More you spend "His Treasures", preach The Gospel, more you please
Father to receive more.
Scriptures + holy spirit (common sense) = The
Gospel
Gnostic heretic explains why Jesus had 12
Labourers? 7 in the name of Yahweh (John, the Baptist) and 5 in Christ Jesus =
12. https://youtu.be/zNtyGuUbwuA
From Judaism born of water + 7 to Christianity
born of the holy spirit + 5 = 12 TANN (Physical tribal body) + MUNN (Mind, Nafs, etc.) = 12 Purified (Nirmall)
Hajj is for the Heavenly Peaceful living of the sons of Man, "Ba-Ilah" and not for the sons of Satan in "La-Ilah".
www.gnosticgospel.co.uk/faithfat.pdf
Punjabi -
How a Pathan Zaildar who
performed Hajj and became Super Bastard Fanatic Devil?
True Story.
www.gnosticgospel.co.uk/Pathan201.pdf
Four
types of loves:-
www.gnosticgospel.co.uk/loves.htm
Family of
God:-
www.gnosticgospel.co.uk/FamGod-1.htm
Solitary Royal Priests.
Test for
twice-born:-
www.gnosticgospel.co.uk/antichrist.htm
Flesh +
soul = Once-born natural Disciple of the Rabbis
Flesh +
soul + spirit = Twice-born sensible Labouring son of God
Fanatics
are super bastard Devils – John 8v44:-
www.gnosticgospel.co.uk/seedterr.htm
www.gnosticgospel.co.uk/fanbastards.htm
Trinity
is explained:-
Playlist:- www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PL0C8AFaJhsWyU_oUMJodHvSZGoNDPk5bu
Johns baptism:-
www.gnosticgospel.co.uk/johnsig.pdf
Please
print these pages to understand Baani as well:-
Punjabi
Book:-
www.gnosticgospel.co.uk/pdbook.pdf
www.gnosticgospel.co.uk/trinity.pdf
Youtube Playlist on Trinity:- https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PL0C8AFaJhsWyU_oUMJodHvSZGoNDPk5bu
Johns baptism:-
http://www.gnosticgospel.co.uk/johnsig.pdf